¿Alianza PAN - PRD a Cambio de Liberación de NarcoFuncionarios?

* ¡LIBERAN A PERREDISTAS ACUSADOS DE ESTAR LIGADOS AL NARCO EN     MICHOACAN!

* ¿SERA PARTE DE LA ALIANZA ENTRE EL "PAN" Y EL "PRD"?

* CALDERON RECIBIRA AL DICTADOR VENEZOLANO, CHAVEZ, EN LAS PLAYAS PARA MILLONARIOS DE CANCUN.

Desde el 25 de septiembre de 2009, advertimos que debido a sus equivocadas decisiones de gobierno, así como a su afán de restituir el presidencialismo, el mandatario mexicano Felipe Calderón había perdido las elecciones de julio pasado, y con ellas, el respaldo popular, el liderazgo dentro de su propio partido, y el apoyo de sus aliados naturales.  Y que frente a tal panorama, Calderón parecía seguir el consejo o el ejemplo de Ernesto Zedillo, quien ante un panorama similar que vivió como Presidente, prefirió en el año 2000 entregarle la Presidencia de México al candidato de oposición, Vicente Fox, antes que admitir un triunfo del candidato de su propio partido, el PRI, Francisco Labastida Ochoa. 

Es así que en septiembre pasado adelantamos que Calderón experimentaría en las elecciones para renovar el gobierno del estado de Oaxaca este año, una alianza con el partido socialista mexicano PRD para los comicios presidenciales del año 2012. 

De septiembre del año pasado a la fecha, todos los pasos que han dado tanto el Presidente Calderón como la dirigencia nacional de su partido, el PAN, se orientan en este sentido: promover una trasvase ideológica que conduce a una alienación de ambos --gobierno y partido oficial mexicanos-- hacia los intereses tanto de la Internacional Comunista --Cuba, Venezuela, Bolivia-- como de la Internacional Socialista o Socialdemócrata --España, Brasil, Argentina...--.

1.- El Presidente Calderón recibió en México al depuesto Manuel Zelaya con todo los honores propios de un jefe de Estado, sin serlo. 

2.- Semanas después envió un avión de la Fuerza Aérea Mexicana para tratar de sacar al mismo Zelaya de Honduras, donde se había internado clandestinamente con la complicidad del gobierno socialista del brasileño Lula da Silva.

3.- En las Naciones Unidas, en diciembre pasado la representación mexicana votó en favor de una moción apoyada por gobiernos socialdemócratas y alentada por los lobbies gay y abortista, que fue rechazada por una mayoría de países africanos, musulmanes y del Caribe.

4.- El presidente visible del partido gobernante mexicano, Cesar Nava, abrió las puertas de dicho organismo a la exlegisladora socialista Ruth Zavaleta, partidaria del aborto y de las uniones entre personas del mismo sexo, y a la que calificó de "mujer de excepción".

5.- El PAN anuncia que no solamente se aliará con los socialistas del PRD en las elecciones del estado de Oaxaca, sino en otras entidades más, como la tradicionalmente católica Puebla; Hidalgo y Durango, que también celebrarán elecciones este año.

6.- El mismo presidente visible del PAN, César Nava, señalado por algunos dizque de católico, rechazó toda argumentación doctrinal contra la legalización de las bodas entre personas del mismo sexo y el otorgamiento de derecho para que éstas puedan adoptar menores de edad, aprobadas por los legisladores del socialista PRD en la ciudad de México. Por el contrario, luego de renegar públicamente de fundamentarse en Dios o la moral, asumió una conducta liberal, al anunciar la realización de una encuesta.

7.- Se anunció que vendrá a México el dictador venezolano Hugo Chávez. Tendrá un encuentro con el Presidente Felipe Calderón en Cancún, el sitio de recreo preferido por los millonarios. Es un contrasentido, pues Hugo Chávez, por ejemplo anunció la expropiación de terrenos de golf en los hoteles venezolanos, pues dice que es una práctica deportiva de "capitalistas". 

8.- Pero el hecho que ha llamado poderosamente la atención de analistas políticos, es la liberación de servidores públicos michoacanos a los que las autoridades federales habían encontrado ligados con los cárteles de la droga. Se hizo enorme escándalo con motivo de su detención. Ahora, sin más, quedan libres.

En efecto, no obstante haber sido consignados por participar en actividades del crimen organizado, ahora resulta que están libres por falta de pruebas. 

Hace meses, las autoridades federales presumieron ese operativo, denominado El MIchacanazo. 

Ahora, sin embargo, el PRD es es aliado del partido oficial, el PAN.

¿Qué otras cosas veremos, en ese esfuerzo oficial de ligarse al PRD?

¿Hasta dónde llegaremos?

¿Hasta dónde estarán dispuestos a llegar el gobierno y el PAN, en su intento de tratar de impedir el esperado retorno del PRI a la Presidencia de la República?

Who runs the foreign policy of Mexico? The President does not

PORTFOLIOS




* THE "PAN" preach one thing and does another


* TO JOIN THE OFFICIAL GAME?


* For which is greater: Ruth Zavaleta OR PRINCIPLES?




OF JOSE A. PEREZ STUART




1 .- The question of the elections held last Sunday in November 2009 in Honduras.

2 .- The opening of his political party, the PAN, so that it enters the troubled Mexican socialist activist Ruth Zavaleta.

3. - The upcoming visit to Mexico by Hugo Chávez and

4 .- The president's acceptance of the Mexican Socialist Party PRD, Jesus Ortega, to ally with the ruling PAN in future elections to be held in the country ...

There are four aspects that go hand in hand, in continuing to claim that Mexico's ruling party to abandon in practice its principles of doctrine and consolidated as one of social character.

Do not forget that Felipe Calderón was presented as a man of doctrinal line of the party, would seek to amend the abandonment of principle for the government of his predecessor, Vicente Fox also PAN, whose government had clearly demonstrated the inadequacies of hybrid scheme.

Indeed, the hybrid scheme of government desilucion the bulk of the Mexicans, who after 70 years of control of one party, the PRI, expecting real change. Against all hope, people watched the first non-PRI Mexican President Vicente Fox, took office in 2000, bounded by his predecessor, Ernesto Zedillo, and the discredited leader of contributions, Elba Esther Gordillo. The Fox, in contrast, did not have any definite direction, made no substantial change in the national and international direction of the country and caused the popular displeasure.

The presentation of the current Mexican President Felipe Calderón as a man who represented the opposite side of Vicente Fox, quickly faded:

A) To become presidential candidate of the PAN, it was demonstrated that open elections in that political party, Calderon had been supported teacher surreptitiously controlled by Elba Esther Gordillo throughout Mexican territory.

B) During the presidential elections of 2006, also reported that telephone calls were placed to intervene demanifiesto own magisterial leader Elba Esther Gordillo with PRI governors, to make it succeed Calderón.

C) The official election results of 2006 have been severe and constantly questioned, both by specialized analysts and politicians opposing the ruling party. The official vote difference that separated the caldron of Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador, was stunted. So Lopez Obrador called himself "the legitimate president."

D) Anyway, when he ascended to power, Calderon applied the same recipe as its predecessor, and had to re-allocate space in the administrative apparatus to representatives of both Ernesto Zedillo as Elba Esther Gordillo.

E) Like Fox, has made no substantive structural change that can bring out that Mexico has a government other than those arising doctrinally PRI. The only "structural" reforms that have sought to have sought changes that is efficient in the energy sector, for example. Everything else remains the same. As in the days of the PRI.

F) The handling of foreign policy was not free to Calderon. Indeed, the space reserved Fox during his tenure and was able to handle differently, with men of his confidence in front of the Camcillería, by contrast, the dumbbell Elba Esther Zedillo seemed to force the current Mexican president to return the management of foreign policy to the old social groups, Lombards, who with the PRI Luis Echeverría, José López Portillo and Miguel de la Madrid, handled the Ministry of Foreign Affairs:

* Immediately Calderon was seeking a rapprochement with Fidel Castro's dictatorship.

* Immediately Calderon was also restored close to Hugo Chávez.

* Not only that, they torpedoed the Mexican presidency of the Christian Democratic Organization, in the hands of the PAN Manuel Espino.

However, the problem is that President Calderón is perhaps forced not only forgotten the ancient Mexican principle of international relations or law Estrada of "non-intervention and self-determination of peoples". So that immediately after the recent elections held in Honduras, disqualified. As is general knowledge, Manuel Zelaya was constitutionally deposed from the office of president by the Congress of his country because he violated the Honduran Constitution. However, instead of sending him to prison, Congress took a magnanimous gesture, take it out of the country, but this was used by Hugo Chávez to try to convert Zelaya a "martyr" and try to reimpose illegally in the presidential chair with support from the Brazilian Socialist government.

Why, then, to play into Chavez?

Faced with natural allies, as employers in the country and militants of the party itself which took him to the presidency, Calderon seems to be taking both his government and the PAN to a social position through open partnerships with Socialists

* The visible president of the PAN, Cesar Nava, repeatedly has sought alliance with the Socialist Party PRD.

* Last week declared "Mexican Exception" to the militant socialist Ruth Zavaleta, significant other of the PRD leader in Iztapalapa, Rene Arce. Zavaleta, unlike PAN, is in favor of gay marriage and abortion, for example.

The National Action Party, which was the big loser in the elections held in July this year in Mexico, has been decreasing its electoral clientele, precisely because the loss of identity among voters. The partnerships established with the socialist PRD, have not generated victories but defeats.

How to find electoral loyalty among Mexicans, if the PAN is allied with a discredited party, scandalously divided and flying early doctrine also totally opposed to theirs?
Will agree that the Mexican military and / or vote for the PAN in Ruth Zavaleta regarded as "exceptional"?

In Mexico, the next general elections are within 18 months. The ruling PAN has organized a national membership campaign doomed to fail, "then what good is to join a party called" exceptional "to those who go against its own principles? So why should I be a member of that party if, as happened three years ago, it allowed anyone, not a member of it, could elect a presidential candidate?

perezstuart@gmail.com